
Charisma Isn't Always Enough
By Herbert M. Greenberg, Ph.D., Founder and CEO, Caliper
What makes a charismatic leader? A number of images come to mind: Winston Churchill’s ability to inspire, Henry Ford’s vision, John F. Kennedy’s speaking presence, General Patton’s ability to command, Leonard Bernstein’s passion, and maybe even a touch of Donald Trump’s bravado.
Charismatic leaders are those rare individuals who can chart a course, fill people with a new sense of purpose, light a fire that encourages people to reach further than they have ever reached before, and somehow make the distance between the starting point and the goal seem shorter than it really is.
But while charismatic leaders can be inspirational, not all of them have the ability to develop a cohesive and collaborative sales team.
We were reminded of this shortcoming recently with one of our wholesaler-distributor clients. The firm’s sales division, which had been performing very well, quickly went into a tailspin. For more than three years, this division had been the company’s plum, producing at levels that continually set records. Then, in recognition of the division’s long-term exemplary performance, the charismatic sales manager—who had been at the helm of this division—was promoted to the front office.
Within two months of his promotion, it became clear that the team he left behind was beginning to fall apart at the seams. When this leader—the team’s true driving force—was removed, the quality of the remaining group found its real level. Part of what happened, we found, was that the loyal team left behind felt a sense of resentment and betrayal when its manager—a strong, driven, and dynamic individual—was promoted.
At the same time, the transition for the new sales manager turned out to be too fast and too rocky. While the new sales manager was very capable, he wasn’t quite prepared to take on this sizeable challenge. As he tried to secure his footing and place his own imprimatur on the division, he became somewhat cautious.
To his sales force, this guarded style was interpreted as a lack of enthusiasm and optimism, two qualities with which they had become very familiar. Soon, this negative mind-set started to erode confidence. When the original, more charismatic manager set goals, for example, the tendency was to respond positively. But similar demands put forth by the new manager were viewed as unrealistic and were subsequently resisted.
In addition, we discovered that the quotas set by the former manager were met, to a large degree, through his own sales activity. Over the years, a tacit system had been developed whereby the sales force became prospectors who would bring the manager along on the final visit to close a sale. The sales force, in effect, was just opening doors; the former sales manager was the closer.
In this case, the solution was to bring the charismatic manager back temporarily, to help smooth the transition by coaching his replacement and sending signals to the staff that he was transferring his authority to his successor.
The new sales manager, in turn, was counseled more formally for his new role, particularly in the areas of motivating, goal setting, and delegating, while the team members themselves received targeted training in closing techniques. Also, a composite personality profile of the most successful salespeople (a profile that assessed strengths, limitations, and motivations) was developed to assist the new manager in evaluating applicants. After only a few months, the team was primed to resume its former high level of achievement, and the original, charismatic leader was able to assume his new challenge.
Unfortunately, it isn’t always this simple.
Some Caveats
Charismatic leaders can bring a special quality to an organization. On one hand, they are able to focus on large and competitive issues, fold the individual’s concerns into their vision, convey their ideas in compelling terms, generate enthusiasm, and—defying the laws of physics—actually create some sales energy within their teams.
But there are also a number of risks that an organization takes in counting too heavily on charisma alone.
For one thing, we’ve found that, generally speaking, charismatic leaders have a hard time sustaining their momentum over an extended period. In most cases, they are usually the right person at the right time under the right circumstances.
On the other hand, they are needed and defined by those same circumstances. In another situation, their particular brand of “magic” might not work as well. And they may have trouble with staying power.
In the long run, because they are more self-centered and less group-oriented than most managers, charismatic individuals aren’t likely to concentrate on developing the capabilities of other team members. Part of the reason is that, unlike most topflight managers, the focus of many charismatic leaders can be all on them. So they can keep the emphasis on them, rather than growing, developing, and empowering the members of their team.
When it comes to delegating, for instance, they often pass on the responsibility, but seldom relinquish the authority. They might assign tasks, but then they want their people to report on every minute detail. There tends to be an unspoken agreement that employees should check with them at all times. Taken to its extreme, this pervasive need to control even the most trivial activities, like booking a hotel or a flight, stems from being totally incapable of relinquishing power on any level.
They also seem more interested in moving their own ideas forward, as opposed to developing a collaborative environment. For example, they will generally opt for a series of separate individual meetings with team members, rather than larger, group problem-solving sessions that break off into special task forces.
Still, this is not to say that someone who is charismatic will, as a matter of course, become an inept leader. And, we’re not by any stretch of the imagination arguing in favor of the bureaucratic game player over a charismatic sales manager. But just as every coin has two sides, there are certain concerns to keep in mind about charismatic leaders and their staying power.
To continue to be effective, and to develop a winning team, charismatic leaders often have to fight some of their own natural tendencies. They have to make a concerted effort to
- include people rather than exclude them
- empower them rather than control them
- identify and develop the potential of individuals rather than consistently monitor their whereabouts.
In essence, they have to be interested in developing all the players—including themselves.
As one such charismatic sales manager said, “Sometimes I have to sit myself down and consciously say, ‘Let go, delegate, allow other people to try—even if they fail.’”
About this Blog

This blog is created by NAW and its partner Caliper, an international management consulting firm that offers a wide range of personnel services to wholesale distribution companies.